![]() Those using Linux who don’t have the versions mentioned above available on their distribution’s package manager yet are urged to download the “deb”, or “rpm” package from the Download center or build LibreOffice from source. Users will have to do the updates manually by downloading the newest version from the LibreOffice, OpenOffice download centers, as neither LibreOffice nor OpenOffice apps provide auto-updating. For LibreOffice – 7.0.5 or 7.1.1 and later.Those using at least one of the open-source office suites are recommended to update to the most recent version as quickly as possible. The same issue affects LibreOffice, a project fork of OpenOffice that originated from the main project over ten years ago and is recorded as CVE-2021-25635 for their project. Ruhr University Bochum’s cybersecurity researchers were the first to notice this vulnerability in OpenOffice, which has been tracked as CVE-2021-41832. The digital signatures used in document macros are intended to assist the user in determining whether or not a document has been modified and can be trustworthy.Īllowing anyone to sign macro-ridden documents themselves, and make them appear as trustworthy, is an excellent way to trick users into running malicious code. Vulnerability in OpenAI's Account Validation Process Allows Unlimited CreditsLibreOffice and OpenOffice have released fixes to tackle an issue that allows hackers to make documents look as if they were signed by a trustworthy source.Įven though the vulnerability is not placed in the ‘High’ severity category being rated as moderate, the consequences could be disastrous. In December 2022, Checkmarx notified OpenAi of the problem, which had been fixed by March 2023. Researchers also suggested applying normalization before processing the value to make sure the input for both checks are the same. ![]() ![]() This allowed the attacker to exploit it by appending zeros to the number and inserting non-ASCII bytes to the same old phone number to bypass the first check because this permutation was not identical to the original value. The vulnerability was that the user-supplied phone number was validated by one component using previously registered numbers, and the following phone number was sent to another component that sanitized it before using it for validation purposes. ![]() Checkmarx's security experts discovered a technique to circumvent this process by using a catch-all email account with a private domain or any temporary e-mail provider and exploiting a flaw in the phone number verification process.Īttackers will intercept and alter the OpenAI API request in order to circumvent phone number limits, enabling them to submit several variations of the same phone number and yet qualify for the free credit for numerous accounts. Researchers from Checkmarx discovered a flaw in OpenAI's account validation process that lets any user receive an endless amount of free credit from the company by enrolling for services an unlimited number of times using the same phone number.ĭuring the account creation process, OpenAI employs an email and phone number validation mechanism, in which an email address is provided and validated via an activation link, and a validation code is delivered via SMS for phone numbers. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |